🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has announced it is claiming compensation totaling $230 billion from the financial institution Euroclear. This legal step represents a direct response by the Kremlin regarding plans to use immobilized Russian sovereign assets to aid Ukraine.

The Substantial Demand

Based on reports in Russian state media, the central bank initiated a lawsuit last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This amount is equivalent to the stated $230 billion demand.

EU leaders are set to decide later this week on a plan to leverage approximately €210 billion in frozen Russian state funds. This scheme entails providing Ukraine with a substantial loan to fund its military and financial needs.

Most of these funds, amounting to €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution serves as the primary keeper for the Russian frozen financial reserves.

Dispute on Ownership

EU officials have maintained that their plan is legally sound. Their position is based on the fact that ownership of the sovereign wealth still belongs to Russia, despite being it was frozen in EU jurisdictions shortly after the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

Moscow, however, has called any use of the funds as theft. Authorities have warned of reciprocal actions, such as confiscating European corporate assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has assumed a prominent position in peace negotiations, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its funds. He warned that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal.

Geopolitical Maneuvering

With statements seen as an attempt to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the assets plan as "a vicious assault on property rights and the global financial system created by the United States."

The clearing house refused to provide a statement on the latest lawsuit. The institution has previously noted it is contending with more than 100 legal cases in Russian jurisdictions.

Enforcement Challenges

While courts in EU countries are unlikely to recognize rulings from Russian courts, experts anticipate Moscow to pursue implementation in nations with closer relations to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia could try to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, provided that relevant assets can be identified," commented a lawyer from an international firm.

European Safeguards

European authorities indicated they are developing measures to discourage other nations from aiding any Russian lawsuits against European companies. Additionally, they are designing protections to protect EU member states with assets in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

According to the detailed plan, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the cash earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would stay unaffected.

Kyiv would solely be obligated to repay the money in the event that Russia agreed to pay compensation for the immense damage inflicted during the ongoing conflict.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to examine an alternative approach for funding Ukraine. This involves common EU borrowing to fund a loan, backed by unused funds within the European budget.

Such a proposal, nevertheless, requires full agreement among all 27 EU countries. Hungary's government, considered aligned with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its opposition.

Commenting on Monday, the EU top diplomat, a senior official, described the reparations loan as "the strongest solution" for supporting Ukraine. "The reparations loan is based on the Russian frozen assets, meaning it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is also important," she stated. "It also delivers a clear signal that if you cause all this damage to another country, you must pay for the rebuilding."