🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear the manager was able to withstand a loss to lower-league opposition. He weathered losing a crucial European final against a particularly poor Spurs sides in living memory. He could survive home defeats to domestic rivals, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, laying waste to the team's most promising homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling the squad the poorest in Manchester United history. But there was a single opponent with whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to engage. If you challenge the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, like many a Premiership defender in Blackburn’s championship campaign, Amorim took on Jason Wilcox and seems to have missed. Even the most distracted of readers can see the paradoxical situation: a coach who often railed at his players for losing one-on-one duels crumbling when confronted by the intense pressure and formidable presence of a the Premier League’s most intimidating football executives.

In truth, this entire bruising episode seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been tempting, given his nine months of experience at Southampton, to regard Jason Wilcox as little more than a drudge within the club's structure: an individual whose appointment was due as much to his friendship with his former boss Omar Berrada as any verifiable talent. How wrong we all were. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring United’s feted manager, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate Dan Ashworth before him, Jason Wilcox has proved himself as one of football's strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect that the club's competitors are now rightly wary.

A Tactical Clash Over Formation and Philosophy

To illustrate, this was Jason Wilcox who having been part of the hierarchy that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim originally, was instrumental in trying to persuade Amorim to ditch his favored 3-4-3. Naturally, these pleas faced pushback. But perhaps these judgements hold greater authority when delivered from the mouth of a man the impeccable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of international appearances and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to outline his reasoning to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point questions may arise why Amorim is walking away with full compensation, without any penalty clause activated. The director seldom speaks in public, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals in football – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – function on a plane exceeding our mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, probably all we would hear would be high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Wanting is not equivalent to being prepared to comprehend it.

The Supreme Power In the Throne

But of course, by focusing our attention on the sporting director we overlook the true genius behind the club's current leadership. The director is, in reality, simply carrying out the directives of his superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has emphasized his preference for a four-man defense. According to reports, the owner has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for United to embrace analytics and analytics. Per reports, during a leadership summit early in his minority ownership, he announced that the team's approach to football “shall be decided by this group”.

After all, Sir Jim is an expert in this technical footballing stuff, drawing from his background in petrochemicals and sailing. Most importantly he remains immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the wealthy are the best of us: more perceptive, sagacious, strategically brilliant, simply superior. Whom else would you trust to oversee an enlightened programme of austerity, the building of a new stadium that looks a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of a new striker?

The New Soccer Hierarchy: Directors Above Coaches

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels of the game. For decades, teams mistakenly delegated big footballing decisions to low-level employees like managers, talent spotters – players themselves. Perhaps it was once feasible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with ideas and drive to go into a club and implement their plan supported to fruition. But how many companies have such individuals set up? How many mass redundancies have they overseen? Far preferable to place the real power where it belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to decide the tactics by the directors and appoint someone who will adapt their methods to suit. If managers were once chefs, they have become more like Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the food, but still finally accountable if it arrives poorly or fails to meet standards.

Nowadays, a coach's role has become not about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the public face for a club they have minimal power to influence. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of literal children into Europe and secures two medium-sized trophies, and essentially gets sacked for talking. A manager at Celtic sees his standing damaged while those individuals who hired him live to blunder indefinitely.

A Modern Corporate Football: Accountability for the Coaches

And perhaps in a small way this represents neoliberalism in action: the elevation of a gilded overclass who are infallible, whose decisions are always untouchable, whose errors can invariably be resolved by sacking without justification. Hire the 3-4-3 coach only to dismiss him for playing too much 3-4-3. Hire the project manager and later bin him for taking excessive time. And most importantly show gratitude; for your modest season ticket price rises, for the latest player acquisitions, for the fact that the grownups – however well qualified – remain in control.